Est. 1964 · Mumbai1964 – 2025 · every issue, digitised
Parsiana
The global Zoroastrian link medium
Readers' Forum

Subscribers’ comments

Subscribers’ comments on Parsiana’s strengths and weaknesses written on the subscription renewal form are published with their consent. Unless another name is affixed to the remarks, Parsiana assumes they are written by the subscriber.

Parsiana’s strengths: We get to know about our community — the good, the bad and the ugly! Who needs soap operas?
RHODA P. CHOKSEY

Parsiana’s strengths: Handles the views of forward looking, moderates and fundamentalists of the Parsi community. Shortcomings: Required to publish articles from management experts. Also need to include legal advice for people seeking advice on various matters.
B. P. ICHHAPORIA

Parsiana’s strengths: Parsiana is logical in presenting its views or the news, open-minded. Production and editing are impeccable. It provides unbiased world reportage. PHIROZE B. JAVERI

Parsiana’s strengths: Deep knowledge of and access to current community affairs. Shortcomings: Occasionally dogmatic reviews.
ARMIN D. KALYANIWALLA

Parsiana’s strengths: Open to reforms and in sync with the changing ground realities in Bombay. The best articles are by Berjis Desai. Shortcomings: Need to be more candid. Back the reformists out in the open lest we perish.
JIMMY F. KHAN

Parsiana’s strengths: Topical. Shortcomings: Too much about traditionalists. They should be ignored completely. We must forge ahead. ZARIR MASTER

◆ ◆ ◆
From the archive