Est. 1964 · Mumbai1964 – 2025 · every issue, digitised
Parsiana
The global Zoroastrian link medium
Readers' Forum

Subscribers’ comments

Subscribers offer their views on Parsiana’s strengths and weaknesses on the subscription renewal form returned to us. With their consent we publish their comments so that their thoughts may be known to a wider readership. Unless another name is affixed to the remarks, Parsiana assumes they are written by the subscriber whose name appears on the form.

Parsiana’s strength: Good coverage.
FRENY R. GANDHI

Parsiana’s strength: Best news. Shortcomings: Nil.
SORAB P. MAJOO
Poona

Parsiana’s strength: Wide coverage.
J. J. MISTRY

Parsiana’s stren­gths: Good presentation of the global Zoroastrian community with high quality journalistic acumen, print quality and photographs well presented. Shortcomings: Tilting a bit towards reformist ideas.
NOSHIR G. PAGHDIWALLA

Parsiana’s strengths: Zero. Shortcomings: Innumerable. KERSY D. PANTHAKI

Parsiana’s strengths: Unbiased publication of our community’s events and happenings in India and abroad. Shortcomings: Nothing whatsoever.
KALI N. PESHOTAN

Parsiana’s strengths: Objective reporting, comprehensive coverage of community affairs both at home and abroad. Shortcomings: Dwells too much on internal squabbles.
FAROKH J. SAGAR
Madras

Parsiana’s strength: Community coming together. Shortcoming: Coverage seems to be limited. HOMI P. USTAD

Parsiana’s strengths: Giving all round information on the Parsi community. Shortcomings: Nothing really.
KHURSHID ASPI WADIA

◆ ◆ ◆
From the archive