Est. 1964 · Mumbai1964 – 2025 · every issue, digitised
Parsiana
The global Zoroastrian link medium
Readers' Forum

Priest and prejudice

With great sorrow I read a WhatsApp forward from one of the daughters of the late Bahadur Hansotia (pictured) of Cusrow Baug who passed away on September 27, 2020. She was heartbroken that her father had been denied four days’ prayers at the Karani Agiary in Cusrow Baug because he had married a non-Parsi. Hansotia had looked after his non-Parsi wife for five years while she lay comatose in bed, trying every medical option at great financial expense. Parsi Zoroastrian men married to non-Parsis continue to be Parsi Zoroastrians, so why were funerary prayers denied to him? Under which Gatha, the only songs and utterances of Zarathushtra available to us, was this denied? The Ahunavaiti Gatha in fact states, "‘How do I choose the right path?’ Answer: ‘Do not entrust religious instruction to the fanatic’" (Ervad Kavasji Kanga’s translation — Yasna 31.17). Scholar Irach Taraporewala translated the passage as: "Let him that knows inform the wise; no longer let him that knows nothing deceive. Be to us, O Mazdah Ahura, the Teacher of Good Thought."
The priest who denied Hansotia the prayers has not acted with good thoughts, words or deeds. The priest is entitled to his opinion, but it is not a law as it applies only to him and within his jurisdiction. He applied this to a man who treated every person entering the bank he worked for with dignity, equity, compassion and generosity. Hansotia lived by true Zarathushti values.
A majority of Parsis today seek religious succor in babas, novenas, mantras or taviz. They pay obeisance to other gods whose images adorn their home altars. Are these hallowed Zarathushtis? Would a priest bar entry to fire temples to such people? Has the Zarathushti religion been reduced to priests not following the true spirit of the religion?
We are sending a loud and clear message: if you are defined a Parsi Zoroastrian as deemed by the Bombay High Court, then you are permitted the privileges of a Parsi Zoroastrian and can avail of all community charities and amenities. The religion cannot bend to suit personal, individual human prejudices. My spiritual needs may be met by other gods and babas. People will say: "To each their own." Why not use the same yardstick for the final prayers?

Hansotia lived by conviction in the true Zarathushti way. He did the right thing because it was the right thing to do.

MEHROO KOTVAL

mkotval@gmail.com

◆ ◆ ◆
2 readers wrote
  • It is indeed unfortunate that Mr. Hansotia was denied the four days' prayers at the Karani Agiary. But I believe that the Davar Beaman judgement of the Bombay High Court itself needs to be revisited. It was passed in pre independence days when there was no Indian constitution. I doubt if its definition of a Parsi will stand scrutiny under Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, as it seems discriminatory against women. I do hope that the Supreme Court, when it finally gets around to hearing the Goolrukh Gupta matter, definitively ends this gender discrimination.

    A reader · 24 October 2020
  • Makes one sad reading such news. Both my parents were very staunch and pious Zoroastrians and if alive would not have agreed with the views of the Dasturji, who is Keeper of the faith denying the four days prayers for a good man who did great service to his community. A community with fewer than 60,000 adherents most of them over 50 years old instead of delving on solutions to prevent the extinction of the community are doing the contrary.

    A reader · 6 November 2020
From the archive